
Documentation of the commercial path to the Internet. Part 1. The IBM Information Network, Network Services Marketing Guide dated Feb 1985 Part 2. Various articles from news letters and announcements from 1985 to 1988. Introduction: In 1985, there were thousands of separate networks for individual corporations and government agencies use. That year, the National Science Foundation began discussion and work on a new Internet Protocol (IP) and another network for a closed user group consisting of academic, research and government. See the IBM page Rise of the Internet: http://www.ibm.com/ibm100/us/en/icons/internetrise/ The site has some good information about good hard work by many people. There is a slight error. It tells the story of Rise of the Internet Protocol (IP). It doesn't tell the story of the rise of the Internet. In 1988, the government began activity to adopt the commercial Business Model that IBM introduced years earlier. The Internet is like the Eisenhower Interstate system. IP is like the concrete on the electronic highway. Concrete didn't give rise to the Eisenhower Interstate system. Without IP or concrete both highways exist. When Eisenhower advanced the idea for the interstate highway system, roads already existed using many surfaces. The same applies to data networks. When the idea of an any to any electronic highway was first thought of, many data networks existed using different languages that already existed. It was common for people to build closed networks. However; two years earlier, in 1983, the IBM Information Network adopted an architecture and strategy that was specifically intended to provide a single shared data network connectivity for everyone worldwide in or outside of any business or government to do all things electronic. The concept was based on the statement that anything that can be recorded electronically can be delivered electronically. The IBM Information Network gave rise to the electronic highway when it adopted the Electronic Customer Support Architecture and Strategy in 1983. Until IBM adopted the concept, there wasn't a shared data network designed or intended to do all the stuff that happens on the Internet we know today. That is; there wasn't a network design to interconnect all networks worldwide to allow any user on any network to access any application on any network and to exchange email or other electronic data with any user on any network. Two different requirements will deliver two different network solutions. The government requirement and development was to deliver IP and another closed network to address some to some. The IBM Information Network had already delivered a network to address any to any. The electronic highway compared to the Eisenhower interstate system is a good analogy. The concept of IP is analogous to concrete used on roads. The concept of Electronic Customer Support and IBM Information Network architecture and strategy of any to any is analogous to the Eisenhower interstate highway system. The Information Network grew and was renamed the IBM Global Network. During the development of another closed government Internet, the fair use rules were officially ignored to allow the closed Internet to participate in some of the open Global Network activity. The government business requirement was modified to fit in with the commercial IBM Information Network business requirement. Once the formerly closed Internet was attached to the open IBM IN/GN, the rapid growth in the number of attached networks and users on the Global Network could be counted as Internet attached networks and users. Although the real attachment was to the IBM IN/GN, the numbers were also counted as Internet numbers. The business we know of on the Internet was already being delivered and grew without the government requested development of IP and another closed Internet. When the two paths joined, IBM sold off the Global Network to ATT because the shared data network naturally fit as telephone company business. The IBM people who worked on the government requirement for IP and an Internet remained in IBM to tell their story. http://www.ibm.com/ibm100/us/en/icons/internetrise/ Their work gave rise to TCP/IP which is like concrete for a road. The IBM Global Network people went to ATT and are there to tell their story. Their work gave rise to the Internet which is like the Eisenhower interstate highway system. I tell some the IBM Global Network story. I worked in the IBM Information Network/Global network between 1983 and 1996. Before IBM sold the Global Network, I was transferred and managed a project to close IBM's HONE VM legacy applications and to migrate them to an IP application environment. I provide some historical documentation about the IBM IN/GN electronic highway concept of any to any that preceded the government requirement for another closed network using new IP concrete. Documentation elevates the discussion from simple recollection to valid research. I looked through my files and selected a few parts of a few dated documents about commercial inter-enterprise network services electronic highway activity before the commercial providers switched to IP concrete in the mid 1990s. Part 1 In 1982, the IBM Information Network (IBM IN) began business with facilities in 7 major USA locations. It became the IBM Global Network with worldwide locations. In the mid 1990s it switched from using SNA to IP as one of many ISPs before IBM sold it to ATT. The IBM IN marketing Guide for Network Services includes the a strategy to connect all users on all networks to allow any to any. The Marketing Guide based is based on my 1980 work that describe the concept of a single shared global network to allow any to any and included a strategy to accomplish the goal. I scanned selected pages from the February 1985 second edition form number ZZ34-2240-1. I include the cover page front and back for documentation purposes. I include part of the table of contents to show that the concept of any to any is included in various part of the marketing guide. This page has a diagram showing multiple enterprises and individual users using one shared commercial network. There were thousands of closed private networks. Initially, the Information Network was unique as the first network designed to connect any to any world wide. On page 1-1, I introduce the comparison of the shared inter-enterprise data network being like the interstate highway system or any other shared network. Just as the Eisenhower interstate system can use concrete or any other road surface, the shared inter-enterprise data network can use any language such as IP. Without IP, the electronic highway emerged and experienced most of it's business growth in just over 10 years. The individual user growth began and was large without IP. Individual use did experience most of it's growth after IP was adopted by the commercial service providers. On page 1-2, I reemphasize the concept of a shared data network across business or enterprise. I make a simple comparison of the shared voice network with the new concept of a shared data network. Actually, data is on the shared voice network. Various individual enterprises lease voice lines then put data on them. This comparison makes it easy to see the value of a shared data network just as people use a shared voice network. I find it humorous to talk of voice over IP. That is voice over IP that is over voice. (NOTE: This is a hint of a new technical architecture.) On page 1-3, I show various business and individual users sharing the single data network with the concept of any to any when authorized. That was future thinking back then. It is a commonly understood today. On page 3-2, I introduce the phases of growth from single enterprise use to multi-enterprise and include the concept of electronically doing business with suppliers and customers. This is part of strategy to arrive at the architecture of a single any to any shared data network. When I originated the architecture and strategy in 1980, there wasn't a single shared data network for all users. There wasn't any plan or approach that would deliver the shared data network. There were millions of users on intra-enterprise networks. IBM had 33 separate isolated networks. One of my contribution was to provide a business reason to justify the cost of building a shared data network. I advanced the idea of IBM consolidating it's networks and to build a commercial version of it's VNET. I called the proposed network CNET for Commercial Network. This page contains one of the most important productivity concepts which is the statement about anything being recorded electronically can be delivered electronically. There was significant productivity improvement as a result of the any to any shared data network concept. Most of the productivity improvement occurred while IBM's SNA was the road technology before the change to the IP road technology. One type of productivity improvements resulted in elimination of jobs that were in place to reenter the data that had been printed then delivered through the mail. Just in time production became realistic due to electronic delivery of data. Page 3-3 Multi-enterprise electronic business already existed. It was dial up. People were dialing in to get to information providers and even to games. IBM was doing dial up customer support. One of IBM's new small computers dialed in to an IBM system for problem determination. Things evolve. However; the prospects were for slow growth in the dial up customer support and multi-enterprise electronic business. The new IBM IN approach was for all business and government to have a single leased line from their internal networks to the shared network connected to all business and government. Also, individual users could dial into the same single shared network to do electronic business and communication with anyone. Information providers could eliminate their dial support and simply use the shared network to expand their reach. In 1985, IBM IN was already providing the any to any electronic highway solution while a new IP concrete was being considered and developed as another language for use on another closed government network that prohibited business and other things the Internet is know for. The concept of a shared data network allowed simple rapid expansion of the inter-enterprise business across multiple industries. One connection to the shared data network provided a global reach. Electronic business already existed before I wrote the architecture and strategy. It goes back to the first bit on the telegraph. It existed before a chairman of IBM shortened it from electronic business to e business. People were dialing in to get to information providers and even to games. Electronic business would have continued in some form. The most likely prospects were for slow growth evolution use of dial up between business and consumer. If I hadn't written the architecture and strategy, there wouldn't have been an electronic highway or shared data network parade for the government to run to get in front of then claim to be the leader of. I simply put the parts together in an architecture of any to any on a shared data network. I also defined the strategy to accomplish the goal. First build a shared data network to provide an interconnection for inter-enterprise electronic business worldwide. Use IBM electronic support as a cost justification for the initial connection. Use inter-enterprise electronic business of all kinds as further justification. If the government hadn't requested a new IP concrete and another closed Internet, then business would have developed a replacement technology for SNA and the standards group language. The replacement language or road technology would have include the operating network approach and it would have included a similar address schema that we know today. The replacement language would have addressed requirements that can be seen today but are not addressed. On that page, I include selected articles from news letters and product announcements. I include significant electronic customer support as well as global activity documentation. The BITNET connection announcement to IBM IN is shown. I include an article about all 50 state DMVs being connected to IBM IN. |










| In an article called “What Is The Internet (And What Makes It Work) - December, 1999 By Robert E. Kahn and Vinton G. Cerf” they write: http://www.cnri.reston.va.us/what_is_internet.html Quote For a long time, the federal government did not allow organizations to connect to the Internet to carry out commercial activities. By 1988, it was becoming apparent, however, that the Internet's growth and use in the business sector might be seriously inhibited by this restriction. End quote When the Internet Business Model was 8 years old and in place, it was adopted by the developers of IP. |